Some have found Rupert Murdoch's recent relationships with the Clintons puzzling (he's held a fundraiser for
HRC and supported WJC's
Global Initiative, notably). Doesn't strike me as puzzling at all. First, let's not let the myth of Clintonism obscure the reality of it -- this was a center or center-right administration in most arenas (or conservative, with a small "c," if you prefer), especially on economic policy. Second, as John Cassidy writes in this
New Yorker article (hat tip to
Cursor),
Lord Palmerston’s description of nineteenth-century England applies to Murdoch’s empire: it has no eternal allies and no perpetual enemies, only permanent interests.
Again, refer to your current reading in McChesney. Don't let the politics distract you -- focus on the permanent interests.
1 comment:
Good question/point from Daniel, but I'm not sure how to separate the two -- if political/policy behavior has the effect of favoring oligopoly, does it matter much whether the motivation/cause is ideology or seeking political gain? And to polisci lover, what would that third choice be? (No fair to posit and run!).
Post a Comment